Review of Tarja’s ‘In the Raw’

Review © Jessica Clingempeel | CEO Of Ethereal Metal Webzine | Tarja's USA Admin

I have been a fan of Tarja’s since she has been with “the band”. I have followed her then and throughout her entire solo career. I have had the privilege to review most of her albums. As a huge music lover, I tend to stay with those who move me the most. Tarja, and many others already know that her music has been an earthly savior to me. Without her music I would have succumbed to the abused past, depression, to the suicidal thoughts. Even then, not every song of Tarja’s have moved me to the point of tears. Every album has its treasure, but for an entire album to move me can be hard. In the Raw has done that. This entire album has moved me to tears, and with every listen that passion I have for these tracks grow stronger. No artist has ever done this to me, NONE!

The album starts off with Dead Promises which many have already heard as it was released as the first single. The album version however features Björn “Speed” Strid who gives his own sound to the song. While Tarja’s solo version is great, Björn made it even better. I also have to mention the song is at its best live. The rawness and the power is greatly seen on stage.

The second track, Goodbye Stranger, also features another collaboration with Cristina Scabbia of Lacuna Coil. This is a collaboration many fans have been wanting for years now and finally it has come to light. I don’t think this song would have worked without Cristina honestly. The melodies blend very well and each vocalist gives their own touch to the song.

The main track that won me over was the song You and I. It is a simple ballad accompanied by a piano, but the lyrics will pull at the heartstrings of the hardest metalhead. This song alone is what won me over without having even finished the album yet. Not everyone has that special someone, I never thought I would, but am blessed to now. Then it goes into the next track, flowing smoothly as if one full song, The Golden Chamber.

The Golden Chamber contains very few lyrics, which are in Finnish. The music and the humming of Tarja’s voice takes you to another world and even without many words tells a story. Tarja, being a huge fan of film music, integrated that into this song, and I think it could be used in a film.

I have to also give credit to everyone else who has worked on this album. The instrumentations are well blended and complement her voice well in this album. The orchestration is also very well done and put together. It would be interesting to hear just an all orchestral version of this album.

Without spoiling too much of this golden treasure I will end the review here. This album contains something for everyone, no matter what genre you are into. Some songs are heavy, some are not, but there are no flaws. That could be the fangirl in me talking though. Make your own opinion. Expect the unexpected.

Other album mentions: Tommy Karevik from Seventh Wonder/Kamelot and Carlinhos Brown.

Overall Rating: 5/5

Pre-order the album now at: https://tarja.tmstor.es/ Out August 30th, 2019.

Review of Tarja’s ‘Dead Promises’ Single

Several people wanted to write a review on this single for the webzine so you will be reading several here. Mine is first, enjoy and be sure to listen to the song (video at bottom, along with a sample of the album version feat. Bjorn from Soilwork) and order this album. Out Aug. 30th, 2019!

All Photography © Tim Tronckoe
Review © Jessica Clingempeel | CEO of Ethereal Metal Webzine | Tarja's USA Admin 

Dead Promises, given the context of the lyrics, has no bearings on Tarja’s promise to deliver a heavier and darker album. This track promises to deliver and succeed! The beginning starts out heavy, gets heavier in the middle, and ends heavy. The instrumentation meshes well with the melodic and emotional context of Tarja’s voice, making this song an outstanding first taste of what I assume will be the album to beat this year.

Instead of focusing on the musical elements of this album, since we already have several reviews, I will focus on the lyrical context and what this song means to me. A little bit of a personal story if you will.

We have all been given a dead promise or two or a thousand. Countries have been given many from the “leaders”. We have all fallen victim to such promises. I was the victim for most of my life, since early childhood. I was given broken promises by my father almost every time I would see him. The promise of love, safety and protection, being there for me. All those promises were dead, were empty. I never saw much love, I never had protection, he was barely ever there, and with him I experienced all kinds of abuse, if not by the hands of him, then by the women and their grown children he would take me around.

I was given dead promises by my ex. The relationship was nothing but control, fights, etc. One-sided, always about him, I was last. These two are just small examples of what I endured in life. Those men were the reasonings for my disbelief in love, my struggles with any kind of relationships (friendship or intimate), and my trust and hatred for humanity that kept getting worse. I had put up a wall and thought nothing or no one would ever get close to and hurt me again as long as I was in charge and kept that wall up. It was just recently I have learned to love again. I met a man that I never thought existed. He has been kind, loving, and every promise so far has been kept and fulfilled. I tore my wall down and gave him the chance. If I hadn’t I would not have ever seen true love.

This song challenges everyone and is a lesson for those of us who have been lied to and hurt. We have all fallen victim to someone and/or something. We can either keep the walls we have built up or we can tear them down, forgive those who hurt us (for us), and trust again. Otherwise we will never know what love is, a good life, nor ever see our dreams become reality. As always, Tarja has hit a personal level for me. She has been my earthly saviour, apart from my mother, because if it were not for her and her music, I would be dead today. I was on the verge of suicide so many times, use to self-harm, pull hair out, scream, cry, hate the world, but it was her music that saved me. This is why I am so loyal to this woman. This new album, after only one song, proves to be another fit for me on a personal and emotional level. As always Tarja, thank you. *

Review © China Tosin | Contributor of Ethereal Metal Webzine  

In short: Very guitar-based, riff-based, with a very important bitter message that hit the hearts of those who habitually break promises or have their promises let down, Tarja’s out there to retribute!

This song’s message seems to be about empty promises in relationships or family conflicts that are not fulfilled and it keeps adding up the pain when the promises keep creating expectations of improvement but not much effort in achieving. However, it can likely to apply outside interpersonal context too, such as unfulfilled political hopes, corporate failure in compensating their services. The line “Dead promises, games you play will kill your dreams…” sends a strong message about those who give empty promises will actually be the ones hurting, too. The vocals are pretty minimal compared to Tarja’s other songs that are a bit more complex, but executed it well, kept it concise, catchy, and powerful.

The music is on the heavier and faster side of her discography, very guitar-based and riff-based. The lead riffs, the main heavy riffs, and choice of sound give the song a “bitter” and “dry” feeling which fits the message. No solo in heavier Tarja songs had not ever been a bad thing, as this song gives you a varied and harmonized version of the lead riff near the end.

The dynamics of the song are very well plotted, as there are parts that the lead riffs playing alone giving excitement and build up, things get heavy on the main riffs and chorus. In the verses are laid down with less distorted guitar picking and bass guitar on higher register makes the song fit the “dry” feeling. *

Review © Jade | Reviewer of Ethereal Metal Webzine

Dead Promises, the first track released to the public from Tarja Turunen’s new album “In The Raw”, is a thunderous song with plenty of guitar and a traditional hard-rock feel. In The Raw is definitely an album title this song belongs on – the music and lyrics combined make for a very naked song, aggressive and not even having to put up a fight to get to the front of the musical line and be noticed. Tarja stated that this new album was going to be darker and heavier than previous albums, and she definitely delivers here.

Turunen’s powerful vocals shine brightly on this track, but the missing element was a heavier, darker vocal – a growl, if you will. From my quick review of the Album Version preview of Dead Promises, this is solved with the addition of Björn “Speed” Strid of SOILWORK. While the single version is a fantastic preview, the album version seems like it’s going to have that one extra element needed to make a perfect heavy metal song. (Though it’s been proven over and over again that Tarja Turunen shines beautifully on her own.)

Overall, Dead Promises was a perfect peek into what’s to come. A crowd pleaser to say the least (as it won a Metal Hammer poll for best new music in metal for the week of its release by a LANDSLIDE), I can say this much: we’re all dying to see it live.

Review © Zach Brehany | Contributor of Ethereal Metal Webzine

If this new single shows us everything, it looks like her promise of a Winter Storm is about to be unleashed with fury, anger, and the darkest corner of herself as a person. We’ve seen this transformation of a classical singer with an exceptional voice to her now being a powerhouse or a vocalist. And yet, years later, we are drawn back into her spell.

The last hard rock album she put out, The Shadow Self, was all about the darker Tarja and the sides of her that are deranged, emotional, and hidden beneath scars of damage she as endured as a performer. If this song is any indication of what the album will entell, we are about to start seeing the wounds uncovered and bloody. 

“Dead Promises” lyrically are as deep as any other song she has put out (brings to mind the lyrics to “I Walk Alone”, “Dark Star”, “Never Enough”, and “Innocence”). They are all recollections of her past with people, theorizing that they deal with Nightwish. When looked at it from that angle, this is a natural progression of herself as an artist: she is moving on, but won’t forget what happened to her for her to be where she is at now. 
The song does create a strong sense of sorrow when you are left thinking about all the promises people have made but keep on breaking. The message, I believe, is that we need to move on from all of that. Those that have betrayed us will no longer be able to continue living their best life because they built there’s off of lying, betrayals, and promises that amount to nothing. We will always have to deal with people like that, but they are not our problem; we don’t have the right to give ourselves to those kinds of people because they will only hold us back. Tarja is moving on from the past and that is what she is telling us to do. 

The instrumentation for this track is what threw me off the most. It feels like she is also moving away from her usual pure orchestration that was what started her career with both her Christmas album “Breath From Heaven*” and “My Winter Storm” and going back to the hard rock elements from “What Lies Beneath” and “Colours in the Dark”. This song isn’t about sounding as sweeping and operatic, but more in your face and out in the open. It’s an interesting choice, but I am left wondering how the rest of the album will play out.

This is a good look into the album and a song I’m sure will be a fan favorite. We are seeing Tarja transform more into the queen of hard rock that we know her as and it seems there is no way to go back. She’s hear to sucker punch us into looking deeper in ourselves and we can only hope that emotionally we will handle what it is like to strip ourselves from what we see and embrace what we find in the raw.  *

Photos © Tim Tronckoe 2018-2019
Review © Ryan Murray | Contributor of Ethereal Metal Webzine

Dead promises – we all hate them. But what can they teach us?

In Tarja’s new song “Dead Promises”, Tarja’s departure from symphonic metal is obvious within the first 30 seconds of this amazing track. (The heaviness kinda brings me back to Ciaran’s Well from My Winter Storm) The intro is lead guitar based. It makes me wonder if Tarja had some influence from Stratovarius during the “Nordic Symphony”. Anyway, at about :17 seconds in, the first power chord hits, and gives you an idea of what this song is made of. Just wait for it. Then the main riff, with drums, kicks in at about :46 seconds, which is where I’d imagine the pit will break out? 🙂

Tarja’s melodies in this song are extremely catchy, no surprise there. What I find most intriguing though is, for a lack of better words, the “rawness” of Tarja’s emotions throughout the melodies. I’ve been a huge fan of Tarja since about 2001, but I’ve never heard such raw emotion coming from her as I have in this song, both lyrically and melodically. This album is said to dive into the raw state of Tarja’s emotion, bringing us into a very personal place lyrically. This song doesn’t disappoint in that regard.

This song truly demonstrates Tarja’s writing ability to hook the listener within just seconds of the song. Driving/heavy guitars, grooving and pulse pounding drums and yet, subtle verses. Tarja’s vocal versatility shines in “Dead Promises”; from her light yet driving “ahh ahh ahhhh”’s during the intro and in between verses, to her more laid back voice during the verses “I’ve seen the walls collapsing, breaking down countless times”, to her belting out “Dead Promises” in the choruses.

“Dead promises
Games you play will kill your dreams
Promises mean everything
Life won’t look back for you”

This line in particular means a lot to me. I’ve had someone in my life that I’ve known since I was 9 years old. This person always made promises that they’d be there to support me, and would always be there to help me grow. Then the back biting and the dead promises started. This person did everything they could to break me down, and eventually, killed a dream for me. I however then look to the line in the second verse “Why can’t you see that your powers will weaken and fall? Oh why, you seem to forget what you make us recall.” This person only had power over me because I allowed them to. Thankfully, I got myself out of that toxic situation and have made new dreams that are becoming reality.

For me, this song reminds us of what empty promises have taught us throughout our lives. We can chose to be a victim, or a victor. We can’t let those who hurt us with empty promises define who we are, and they only define who we are if we give them the power to do so.

If this song is any indication as to what the rest of “In the Raw” holds, I absolutely can’t wait. I always find a true connection to music that is honest and raw; music that pours out emotion and doesn’t hold back. Tarja always pushes the boundaries with her music and tries new things, and because of that her music is always evolving. *

Overall Rating: 4.5/5

Tarja Graces New York City

image
© Photo: Eric Pefley

Review by Jessica Clingempeel
Admin of Winter Storm USA | Ethereal Metal Webzine
9/22/2018

September 9th, 2018 will be a night that will never be forgotten in New York City. It was a long wait for the return of one of the most influential female singers in the metal world today, but the wait was well worth it.

First, the opening band, Symfinity. Seann, the vocalist, came out to greet me as we were waiting outside, and he is an awesome guy. I had the pleasure of getting an interview with this band a few weeks prior to the show and every musician seem to be very humble and down-to-earth. This is a band that you need to check out and see live. So many musicians and instruments, one must wonder, how can they even keep up with everything though. Haha! Seriously though, don’t miss them and don’t be afraid to walk up to them and start a conversation, very nice people!

Symfinity performed several songs, including their new single “Dynamite”. My favourite, however, would have to be “Everything I know Explodes”. I could be biased though as this was one of the first songs I heard from this band and instantly loved.

After Symfinity, fans patiently waited for Tarja to grace the stage. The intro started, and people began packing into the venue like sardines desperate to get as close to the stage as possible. I am a 5’0, tiny woman, GIVE ME SOME SPACE PEOPLE! (haha) Easy to get lost here…moving on..

No Bitter End begins, and screams filled the room as Tarja comes on and begins what is going to be one hell of a show. Though in the beginning there were some tech issues with the mic, Tarja handled it like a champ. Ok, it was cute. 😉 Considering this woman is a powerhouse, a microphone wasn’t even needed.

The setlist contained 15 songs, which includes songs from every solo album and a Nightwish medley.  Every set was a flawless performance, with the acoustic being breathtaking. A standout performance, of course, was ‘Diva’. Tarja comes out wearing, now dubbed the ‘Diva’ crown, that was given to her in Brazil. The entire performance was superb. Though I wish the setlist had included ‘Supremacy’ and ‘Too Many’ I wasn’t disappointed at all. The entire show was AMAZING. Every musician, including Symfinity, gave their all and were flawless. I don’t think anyone left the venue that night dissatisfied, and if they did, I did not notice it. All I saw was passion from the fans and from the musicians.

image
© Photo: Jessica Clingempeel

Of course, the show was ended with the traditional bow and “HIT SONG”. Several people were waiting for that moment and Tarja headbanging through severe neck pain should prove she is passionate for music and for her fans. Please Tarja, look after yourself and as much as we love to see you head bang, no need to make yourself hurt and sick for us! We will love you no matter what. 😊

Hopefully there will be a return from Tarja soon (soon, soon, not Tarja’s usage of soon)  because my ass will definitely be on another eight-hour train ride from Virginia to New York, and standing another 4 to 5 hours in the chilly, rainy weather to be there. Yes, she is that worth it people! Being a fan for over 15 years should prove that.

For those who did not get the chance to meet Tarja yet, your time will come, and the wait will be worth it. Tarja is a very sweet woman and she tries to give time to everyone.

Mad props to Eleonora (she knows who she is.) The rudeness of some people and frustrations you have to put up with, you have balls! Thanks! Thanks to the rest of the crew and band for everything. ❤

image
© Photo: Jessica Clingempeel
image

© Video: Jessica Clingempeel

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish

Reviewed by Brian Kelman
Revised 6/8/2014

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish: Part 1

I was blissfully unaware of the Nightwish with Tarja Era when its drama took place between 1996 and 2005. I don’t have the emotional baggage that comes with following and loving the band’s career and then living through the traumatic dismissal of Tarja after the Hartwall Concert in 2005. I like to think that that would afford me a measure of objectivity. Perhaps. Perhaps not. You can be the judge of that. Making this task difficult is that I have one main written secondary source of information for this era and it is far from objective.

The main source for propagating the myth of the Nightwish with Tarja era is the book by Mape Ollila, Once Upon a Nightwish: The Official Biography, 1996-2006, Bazillion Points, Brooklyn, New York, 2008. Whenever I see ‘Official’ in a title the proverbial Red Flag goes up: so who decides what is ‘official’? It was the culmination of an idea that was hatched in the fall of 2002. Mape Ollila had the task of writing a biography while the story continued to unfold day by day. As a result, the book has a dual personality—there are sections where the narrative is a chronology of events, more anecdotal in nature, fairly balanced and non-judgmental: clearly material collected and written from 2002 to 2004. In comparison, other sections speak to the biased and judgmental interpretive framework and underlying thesis of the book that took shape from 2005 to its completion for publication (and release on May 11, 2006). It is here we find out who determined what was ‘official’.

Despite their protests to the contrary, Mape Ollila wrote with the authorization of Tuomas Holopainen (with the other band members providing entertaining anecdotes and general support to the leader). Although the book is loaded with interesting facts and anecdotes that will be of interest to all fans of the band, it is essentially supporting and justifying Tuomas’ decision to dismiss Tarja on October 21, 2005. This fact became very clear at the beginning. The very structure of the book and organization immediately threw up another ‘Red Flag’. I read Once Upon a Nightwish with the intent to see if Ollila was able to prove his thesis that Tarja and Marcelo (for his interference in band affairs and for causing Tarja to stray from the Nightwish philosophy) forced their hand in making the decision to dismiss her. He does not prove it at all. In fact, the more he tries to convince me he is presenting the unbiased truth about the principle characters and important events, the less convincing he becomes.

Once Upon a Nightwish is like a Shakespearean Tragedy. No, Ollila doesn’t come close to The Bard in writing ability, but the play of events is not unique throughout history of humanity in general and musicians and bands in particular (The Beatles, for example). It is also not unique that some external force is scapegoated as being responsible for the end result. It is also not unique that the real culprit was internal and the band was doomed from within at the very beginning (Brian Jones ousted from the Rolling Stones, for example).

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 2

Setting Up The Characters

The Victim: Tuomas Holopainen

“Tuomas’ mother says he was not good at standing up for himself as a kid, as he was taught not to answer malice with malevolence. If another kid took away his toy at the sandbox, Tuomas would just look perplexed.” (pg. 22).

“….Tuomas never seems to lose his temper and tell people to just shove it–when facing unpleasant or annoying things, he quiets down and withdraws into himself. He does not like to talk about his bad feelings, rather, he discharges them along with other strong emotions into music.” (pg. 23).

Tuomas Holpaninen is presented sympathetically as naive and innocent into his mid to late teens. He is a self-professed escapist. He has low self-esteem and self-deprecating character despite having a remarkable gift of writing and composing really beautiful music. In fact, his only means of real communication is through his music.

The Diva: Tarja Turunen

Tarja makes her first appearance in the Introduction, where she is the subject of Tuomas’ letter. Tarja is set up as the ‘Drama Queen’ and ‘Diva’ from the beginning of her next appearance in the book in the last paragraph of page 39.

“Humming along with a group didn’t satisfy Tarja, however—she wanted to be the center of attention. ‘Whenever we had guests, I would take the women to see the wardrobe. I would change my clothing three times a day, maybe dress in mom’s old curtains and pile up all kinds of rags on myself. I was the only girl in the family, a true princess. At the age of three I already understood the power of drama!

I always wanted to sing….I wanted to be seen and heard….I was very temperamental. I would be angry if my friends got an opportunity to sing somewhere and I wasn’t asked. Even when I was in a children’s club at the age of four or five, I always had to get the leading role or a singing part–if I didn’t, I would get annoyed and angry. If things didn’t go my way, I would stomp my foot on the ground!’” (pg. 40)

If the reader didn’t quite understand this biased preparation, it is reinforced by Tuomas’ reinforcing this assessment of her being born a drama queen. (pg. 40)

A critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 3

Refuting The Set Up

Before I continue, I need to say that I had someone else read the book. His objectivity is assured since he likes Country Music and does not like Rock or, especially, Metal. But he reads biographies that offer a glimpse into lives totally ‘different from my own’. So he jumped at the opportunity to read it. He has no emotional attachment to Nightwish or Tarja. He does acknowledge her ability to sing. But that is about all. What were his conclusions? Tuomas’ is passionate, calculating and not as naïve as he tries to come across as. “Who is supposed to be the ‘Diva’ here?” he asked.

Let’s assume that these are accurate assessments of Tarja and Tuomas when they were children. Ollila certainly wants the reader to keep these characterizations in mind as they read through the book; to look at subsequent events through these lenses he himself has carefully constructed. It is hard not to. Since Tuomas’ letter is presented at the beginning, Ollila has the entire book to hammer into the head of the reader the victimization of poor naive Tuomas. Tarja’s letter is saved until the end where it won’t prejudice what Ollila has tried so hard the entire book to hammer into the reader: the initial character assessment of Tarja the Diva and Drama Queen. It is the same basic gambit Tuomas used when he released the letter: get one’s story out first and make sure it and its contents are the starting point of any conversation. He took the initiative and forced Tarja to react on the defensive.

However, are these characterizations valid by the time they became young adults in their twenties? How can we answer definitively this question independent of Ollila’s interpretive framework? Fortunately, we have two primary sources, one each, that we can evaluate for insights into each of their characters when Tarja is 28 and Tuomas is 29 years old. By putting the letters side by side and evaluating them relative to each other, a different pattern emerges. My analysis concludes that the respective images that Ollila (and Tuomas) carefully constructed and maintained throughout the book are nothing more than illusions and ironic. The irony is: by adulthood there has been a reversal of their respective roles. It is the attempt to hide this basic reversal explains the careful, but unsuccessful, attempt to indoctrinate the reader at the beginning.

Tuomas’ letter is important for two reasons: 1) it establishes a behaviour pattern that can be used to assess character; and 2) it was part of a cynical strategy. Despite having 9 months to plan a reasonable means of dismissal, the chosen option, on one hand, comes across as petulant, immature and petty. As I read it, I picture in my mind that a foot is stomped on the ground. “….We cannot go on with you and Marcelo any longer [Stomp!] ….Your attitude and behavior don`t go with Nightwish anymore [Stomp!] …..People who don`t talk with each other for a year do not belong in the same band [Stomp!] ….I can`t simply write any more songs for you to sing.” [Stomp!]

On the other hand, petulance, immaturity and pettiness does not mean a lack of intelligence nor logical calculation. On the contrary, the letter’s underlying, cynical purpose was a strategy designed to create controversy and therefore a lot of free publicity. Success was achieved. It was a rather cynical treatment of the fans who went to shows from February through October unaware that their favourite vocalist’s days were numbered. Hypocritically, it was Tuomas who accused Tarja of dissing the fans when he himself was doing so for months. Tarja, at least, was up front about her plans to leave after the following album and tour. The publicity generated within Finland (even the President was asked about the situation) and within the niche trade magazines abroad meant Nightwish was a hot topic among some who had never heard of them before or if they had, gave them passing consideration. With the subsequent public search for a new singer, with the controversial details of the dismissal of the last one at least recapped to bring the uninitiated up to speed, it comes as no surprise that when DPP came out, it broke their previous sales record. Mission accomplished. Imaginaerum? No controversy etc. and sales are not what they had hoped is an understatement. Where are all the new fans and those who rubber necked to look at the train wreck that ended the Tarja Era? Was the short term gain really worth it, especially since the myth has unraveled bit by bit with the passage of time and with the similar melodrama and silence surrounding the ‘mutual parting’ with Anette?

Tarja’s letter, on the other hand, is the image of the child looking bewildered when another child took their toy. “This is a moment of grief and pain and I find it very hard to speak….I didn’t know what to say and still at the moment that I am writing these lines, I don’t…..I don’t want to reply to this anger with an even greater anger. Private matters should never be taken to the public…Still everything that has happened is not enough to make them evil in my eyes….The wonderful music we created together won’t be touched by recent events.”

This is not the response of a ‘Diva’. Tarja had but 5 days to compose a response at a time when her emotions would be very close to the surface and a Diva would be expected to lash out in fury; a response that not only would be expected but hoped for in the opposite camp. Rather, Tarja’s response displays a high level of maturity. If Tarja acted like a ‘Diva’ in her youth, she had clearly matured into a responsible young woman by her late 20s. Tuomas’ gambit was not only parried but soundly defeated.

Part of the definition of ‘Diva’ and ‘Drama Queen’ is the blowing out of proportion of small problems. The problems plaguing Nightwish were not small, but misidentified. The problem is alluded to above but is completely missed and, in addition, the very nature of the letter points directly at it. I’ll elaborate on this issue in a later post. But, part of the definition of ‘Diva’ and ‘Drama Queen’ is the behaviour of petulance, immaturity and a desire to publicly humiliate one’s adversary. Mission accomplished on all counts. Tuomas had, by his late 20’s, assumed the Diva’s role. It is sad to see that Tuomas had not matured into a young man who could handle the situation in a professional manner.

A critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 4

DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE:

Out of simple curiosity, over time, when the opportunity presented itself, I’ve conducted a rather simple experiment.  I’ve asked about 25 people, representing a cross section of friends, acquaintances and even strangers, the following: “If you were the leader of a business or were a business owner and you needed to dismiss one of your employees, would you handle it in the following way? Hand them a sealed envelope with their letter of dismissal inside at the end of work on Friday and ask them to read it Saturday while publishing the contents of the letter on the company’s website on Monday? Conversely, how would feel if you were dismissed from your job in this manner?”

The answers I received were unanimous in their revulsion. Some were initially skeptical that someone would actually handle their business this way. So I gave a thumb nail sketch of the events and encouraged them to look it up themselves. I even provided key search words to get them started. The reactions of two women in particular are worth noting. Upon hearing a woman being humiliated in this fashion, she wanted to find some rope and hang Tuomas by his private parts right on the spot. Her friend diffused the situation with a pointed barb when she quipped, “Sounds to me like he doesn’t have any!”

The consensus was? The printable version was that this was the act of a gutless coward; a coward who couldn’t look someone in the eye to dismiss her; a coward who demands respect like a little child while unable to give any himself.

You can’t judge someone by their actions? Tarja (and Sami before her) were dismissed by proxy. ‘Leopards don’t change their spots’ and this is a distinct and repeatable pattern. Stay tuned, it will happen again…oh, yeah, forgot about Anette and her reckoning at Hartwall, but she was spared her dismissal by proxy by getting sick. The only question I have was whether Grand Master T would do it by letter again and go for that free publicity or enlist someone else to do his dirty work. Or did he have a new and more melodramatic means under his top hat. The Emperor has no clothes. (Sorry for putting that awful image in your mind)

Jukka’s justification of the means by which Tarja was dismissed is laughable. His explanation that it would have been impossible to get everyone to a meeting the next day because no one knew each other’s schedules etc. is so lame it makes “The dog ate my homework” look credible in comparison. Tarja’s dismissal had been planned since February 22nd 2005 (pg. 255). For something this important a meeting could have been arranged beforehand. That is if there weren’t ulterior motives behind the dismissal letter discussed above. There is one more ulterior motive behind the way it was done, too, but I’ll reveal that later.

Something had been arranged for the following day, however: a secret Nightwish Party (sans Tarja) to celebrate the end of the tour and presumably the kicking of their lead singer and her meddling manager/husband to the curb. Hence, the four remaining band members’ schedules were known and they would be in close proximity to each other before the festivities.

Hear about it starting at the 4:00 mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clCa_ipFhXk

Therefore, Jukka has been caught telling a lie. A bold faced lie. Can we take the rest of his statements regarding Tarja and the breakup of the band seriously?

Of course, when Nightwish poached Marco from Sinergy, the decision by Sinergy to explain the situation on their website was totally unnecessary according to Jukka. “The conflict with Sinergy was blown out of proportion. ‘The media made it out to be more than it really was’, says Jukka. ‘It was something that happened between bands, just a personal thing, and it was pointless to discuss it on Sinergy’s or our message board….’” (pg. 169)

Hypocrisy. Jukka is a dedicated ‘company man’ (and deserves a lot of credit for his handling of the band’s merchandising and the day to day financial affairs of the band on the road in the early days). As a ‘yes man’, he knows where his pay cheque comes from to support him and his family, and the truth can be malleable depending of whose ‘ox is getting gored’. But given the revelation of his willingness to lie, his statements must be taken with not ‘a grain of salt’ but with perhaps a whole shaker. Ollila’s complicity in covering up the lie is further proof of his role as propagandist.

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 5

Ollila claims that it was the incident on the plane in Toronto on December 19, 2004 that led directly to the February 22 decision:

“According to Tuomas, the situation flew entirely out of hand in a matter of a few hours. ‘As we boarded the plane, Tarja said we should have a discussion in a week and a half. I was like ‘Okay, let’s do that’. But she just kept going on about how she thought King Foo and Ewo handled everything badly and how evil we all were. I just couldn’t listen to it anymore.

The next straw broke the camel’s back. ‘Tarja sat two rows behind me, and I went over to her and just spit out everything on my mind,’ Tuomas continues. ‘That’s when Tarja spoke those legendary words. I knew there was no going back after that moment: ‘Remember, Tuomas, I don’t need Nightwish for my own career anymore. You remember this, Tuomas: I can leave this band on a day’s notice–anytime at all. Remember that when you think about the future. I can make it on my own perfectly well.’ Tarja’s statement was a conversation ender.

Since Ollila didn’t consider it worthwhile to determine exactly what and how Tuomas unloaded on Tarja, even to provide a disclaimer that Tuomas couldn’t remember his exact words (which is highly doubtful given the highly charged emotional atmosphere before and after the exchange), it is more proof of the collusion between them. I wonder what comments Tuomas needed to hide?

Knowing both their comments puts it all into context. That context is critical in understanding the dynamics that were in play at that moment. Without it we are left hanging at best and at worst trusting Ollila’s interpretation. One can feel Tarja’s frustration of trying to talk to a brick wall. I will hypothesize that she said it to try to get some kind of reaction out of Tuomas so that he could be angered into having a meaningful dialogue. Perhaps. Anyway, it had the opposite effect. Tuomas’ reaction was unfortunately typical for him and underlines the problem of communication for Tuomas. Instead of dealing with the issue head on, he internalized it. That accelerated the tragic chain of events that led to the decision made on February 22nd 2005 to dismiss Tarja and Tuomas’ decision to handle that dismissal with a letter.

Tuomas never forgot those words, but one more time, he tried to build a bridge over the ever-widening gap between Tarja and the others. ‘I tried talking with her, asking, ‘Do you understand how it feels when one person–who’s not even a member of the band–makes all our decisions? After all, although the band’s a democracy, it’s still my band. I put it together, I write the songs and lyrics’. but Tarja was like, ‘Tuomas’–fuck, I’m so annoyed by her way of using my first name to put weight on her words–’Tuomas, try to understand that this is not your band but all of ours, including the technicians and managers.” (pg. 243) Tuomas seemed to have forgotten that the record label and others non band members also make decisions the band had to live by…..

Real bad timing for all of this in my opinion. The tour was long with the usual hassles and it saw the band criss-cross the Atlantic Ocean in 7 months (Europe to USA to Europe to South America to Central America to Canada to play three shows postponed from September and finally for three shows in Finland and Germany before the end of the year). The plane was delayed due to it being overweight which upset Tarja most and it gave the boys extra time to drink etc. So you can imagine that cooler heads would not prevail when Tuomas decided to dump all his thoughts on Tarja all at once. If she uttered what she did, it came back to haunt her.

This argument  in Toronto initiated the final chapter in the tragic chain of events that led to the decision that was made on February 22nd 2005 to dismiss Tarja and also why we have the third and final cynical reason the letter was chosen as the means. “Here, read this tomorrow,” Tuomas apparently told her when he handed Tarja the letter. Tuomas had given Tarja one day’s notice; the exact amount of time that she threatened him 10 months earlier. Coincidence? Hardly. Cynical vindictiveness.

Personal Anecdote: In 2004, Nightwish played in Montreal on December 15th and 16th in Montreal. They played the Opera House in Toronto on the 18th. It would be an interesting coincidence if they made the journey between the cities by plane on the 17th because I was in Pearson International Airport on that day about to embark on a vacation to Australia. I may have shared the same airport with the band and never knew it. Of course, if they took a bus, well…..Never mind…..

Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 6

Tuomas complained in his letter that Tarja’s refusal to return to America was another reason for her dismissal. Perhaps she just didn’t want to keep performing in dives. Like this one:

“Graceland is a dingy, spartan venue tucked away in a forgotten corner of Seattle that leaves you wondering “Why is Nightwish playing here?”….It’s the sort of place you would expect to see in a movie as a punk club, seats with torn upholstery, various stickers from all the different bands who had toured through littering every square inch of wall. There was the ever present stench of dried sweat and acrid smoke. It is the sort of place whose walls have many stories of drunken rock and roll debauchery, but not necessarily the sort of place you want to see a high class, high caliber band such as Nightwish.“

On Dec. 18th 2004, Nightwish played the Opera House in Toronto. It is not a place where I’d like to see Tarja. The Opera House is where she made her one and only appearance in Toronto as a soloist in May 2009. Below is a link for customer reviews. Most of the reviews are favourable because the reviewers didn’t expect much more than they got for a venue that hosts minor indie acts and metal bands. Also, too, the reviewers appear to be young and when I was younger—say around 25—I was more into a good time and could over look some flaws. To be transported back in time……

So what if the Opera House is in a sketchy part of town. The sleazy strip bar across the street would be a place for adventure and a few pints before the show starts. The Opera House is licensed with 3 bars inside, one serving each level. Since I was a binge alcoholic back then I was in heaven. The drinking age limit was/is 19 in Ontario, so minors had better have convincing fake ID ready. Concrete main floor with no seating? No problem for young feet. The acoustics aren’t great? They always got better the more I drank….etc.

Any way….you get the idea that in my youth the Opera House would have suited me fine. It reminds me of a place I spent many a night in Kitchener when my favourite bar bands would appear. Not now. I’ve quit all my bad habits and my expectations are a little higher. If Tarja ever comes back to Toronto or nearby on a tour, I hope and pray it is not to the Opera House.

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 7

THE CULTURE OF SILENCE:

The Tarja Turunen Era was going to fail from the beginning. It was not a question of ‘If’ but of ‘When’.

The inability to communicate; to internalize problems and let them stew is described in the book as being a Carelian cultural trait that they all shared. This is, in my estimation, the main reason why events led to the conclusion they did. There are plenty of examples of this. The way the firing of Sami Vanska was handled is one.

Sami was fired because he didn’t agree with the direction the music was going. In fact, in his mind he was being asked to play what he considered sh!t. He became apathetic and started showing up late for rehearsals etc. He expected to be replaced. Tuomas made management break the news to him that he was fired. Tuomas and Sami had been friends for at least ten years and Tuomas didn’t have the guts to man up to his friend. It wasn’t being fired that hurt Sami the most. It was that someone he believed to be his friend couldn’t come to him and tell him. Face to face. Like a man. When you are the leader, learning to communicate with those around you is vital to keeping the organization together. Tuomas’ inability to do this has plagued the band from the start and continues on into the present day. He retreats into resentful silence and escapism. It has made solvable problems fester until they are out of control. Then his only solution is to lash out with a cynical vengeance.

The prime example of cynical vengeance is Tuomas’ letter covered above. In one fell swoop, at the expense of a sheet of paper, envelope, the time to write it and the ability to act a lie, Tuomas was able to dictate his intentions to Tarja, reach millions of current and future fans without having to really communicate–person to person.

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 8

Patterns that have been firmly established in the past, and identified above, continue to wreak havoc in the present…or rather, the near past.

While on tour in the fall of 2012 Nightwish and Anette Olzon parted ways. Originally it was reported by the band that the split was mutual. As reported on blabbermouth.net on January 1, 2014 Anette states that she was ‘fired’ because she was pregnant. The band denied this in a contradictory statement:

“The split with Anette wasn’t because of pregnancy or illness,” they said. “We discovered her personality didn’t fit this work community, and was even detrimental to it… Anette herself offered an option of hiring a replacement vocalist if she couldn’t manage everything, which was already agreed on. Later she took back her decision, and the difficulties really started.”

The first statement belies the mutual parting story (and it took them 5 or 6 years to figure that out?!?!) and the second statement indirectly questions their sincerity over the reason. Once more Nightwish continues the patterns identified above during the Tarja era.

http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/anette-olzon-i-didnt-leave-nightwish-i-was-fired/

A Critique of Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish continued: Part 9

In the same article above, Anette levels another more serious allegation at the band. It strikes at the heart of Tarja’s firing. Anette alleges that during her tenure with Nightwish there were certain financial improprieties committed by the band. She accuses them of  “…not splitting all the revenue equally, forcing her to start her own company and take a financial loss in 2010.” The band’s response was as one would expect: they accused “….their former singer of making claims that were ‘full of twisted truths and defamation.’” A typical non-explanation explanation from those who are quite familiar with uttering ‘twisted truths’ So which part of Anette’s claims are truthful then? Hmmmm….the silence is deafening.

Is Anette’s allegation an isolated case or yet another pattern emerging? Let us examine the question.

In a 2009 interview, Tarja discussed her and Marcelo’s relationship at the start:

In 2001, “… Marcelo followed me to Finland though I told him not to. We hadn’t seen each other for a few weeks, but he could no longer take the separation. I didn’t believe it when Marcelo called me claiming he was standing 50 meters away from my door… I understood only in time that… I can trust this man. When Marcelo lived for one month at my house in Finland at the beginning of our relationship, I gave him a hard time. I tested my limits and I didn’t even agree to give him the little finger. When the guy lasted for 30 days in my 30 square meter one room apartment, I believed that he could keep up with me in long run.”

http://suomi-rocks.blogspot.pt/2009/08/interview-tarja-turunen-i-didnt-know.html

In this context, the most important part of this quote isn’t the romantic angle but rather that Tarja lived in a small one room apartment. Shoved to the fore front to be the face and voice of a successful band whose popularity and record sales were increasing every year lived in a tiny one room apartment?!?! As songwriter, Tuomas was entitled to that share, and he does deserve credit for sharing these monies with his band mates in the early years and some of Tarja’s money would be spent for supporting herself at school in Germany as a student studying abroad. But, one would have to believe that Tarja would be able to afford something a little or a lot bigger? Wouldn’t you? It begs the question: Was Tarja receiving her fair share of the proceeds of album sales? Perhaps. Perhaps not. In another interview she makes some interesting allegations. The interviews can be seen here and I’m trusting a translation below the video being accurate.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR7Bsh-Y5lQ

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HeXAATeNZY

The following translation is from Part 2:

“It’s really sad. And in a band like this, and as big as this, money is a thing that you can’t just pass by. I’ve always been a person who wants to know how the things are going. And if I see something wrong somewhere, I wanna do something about it, and even more if I see it twice. And in the third time I start to wonder. ****And when I wanted to know why this and that happens, I didn’t get any answers from the band, they just excepted it and now they’re answering me like this, and it comes as a shock.”  [****Translator’s note: I have no idea what she is saying here, she has a strange way of expressing herself]

It would seem that Tarja noticed something unusual but was stonewalled when trying to get an explanation.

Is it any wonder then that Tarja needed financial advice and Marcelo, a business man, was someone who she grew to trust to handle that aspect of her career? Especially when she seems to have been kept in the dark over the finances of the band?

Of course, Marcelo and Tarja were accused of greed as one of the reasons for firing her. But something never quite added up with the explanation that Ollila gave. For example, Nightwish management had developed a strategy for dealing with Marcelo’s demanding more than what was originally offered. According to Toni Peiju, they would simply quote Marcelo a fifth less than was offered and he would predictably demand a fifth more. (pg. 251) Band management gloats about how they were beating Marcelo at his own game.

That begs the question: given this apparent successful strategy, were the financial demands of Marcelo and Tarja as big a problem as we are led to believe?

Another allegation leveled at Marcelo was his mishandling of Nightwish record sales or rather the lack of record sales in his native Argentina. Record sales for Argentina of Angels Fall First through to Century Child under NEMS Enterprises sold significantly less than in Brazil. The reason for not looking into this allegation was the belief that legally getting financial records from Argentinian companies was next to impossible compared to European or Finnish companies. Pg. 125-126.

I expect this difficulty of accessing financial records to be true. But there may be another explanation given the above concerns expressed by Tarja:

If Nightwish launched a legal action against NEMS Enterprises would a countersuit by NEMS Enterprises reveal financial improprieties on the part of Nightwish that they would rather be kept hidden?

Critique of Once Upon a Nightwish, Part 10

The villain in Ollila’s melodrama is Marcelo Cabuli. The blame for breaking up the band is placed squarely on his shoulders. For their 2000 tour of South America, the band met Tarja’s soon to be manager and later husband, for the first time as he accompanied the band as tour manager. At first the band liked and got along well with Marcelo. In Mexico, he reinforced this faith with an act of heroism and in doing so highlighted the essential cause of the eventual breakup.

At the Guadalajara concert, Marcelo ran on stage to rescue Tarja from being sexually assaulted and groped by a fan while the band played on either oblivious (unlikely on a small stage) or uncaring (pg. 123-124). Ollila plants the implication that Marcelo used this heroic act to infiltrate Tarja’s defenses and separate her from the band. The beginning of the end of the band was upon them.

A reader with half a brain would have observed that by this point in their careers the only thing keeping Tarja going was her love of singing and performing. Unintentionally, Ollila documented Tarja’s increasing isolation and loneliness while on tour; apathy and neglect was the rule governing the boy’s behaviour toward the person Tuomas thrust to the forefront to be the face and voice of the band. The aftermath of the Guadalajara assault provides sufficient proof of this.

After an understandable delay, the final three songs were performed with Tarja alternating between singing and crying. The humiliation was such that she couldn’t look any one in the eye. As the boys filed off stage after the finale, Sami asked Marcelo to ‘look after her’. Tarja was essentially discarded upon the mercies of a relative stranger to make sure she made it back to her hotel room safely! A stranger who they had known for a mere 10 days! This was nothing less than juvenile, callous and unconscionable. When it was time for men, or a ‘leader’ (Tuomas) to step up and take charge to do the right thing, all Tarja had in the band and crew were immature boys who could think of nothing better than to return to their bottles.

The boys and their crew consistently seemed to forget that Tarja was a woman. Believe it or not people, men and women are different and have different requirements per the individual. No, the band and crew virtually ignored her specific needs when touring before this. No wonder her health suffered from such emotional distress and the fact that, for example, she had to endure second-hand smoke in the confined tour bus and the inability of the band or crew to consistently basic essentials like water for the concert. No wonder she started to hate the process of touring. Well, perhaps the process of touring with children.

Guadalajara started the process that resulted in Tarja having a reliable man to take care of the little things on tour and in her career as well. As the book continues Ollila tries to paint Tarja in the role of ‘Diva’ (ie. the negative connotation of the word). Tarja and Marcelo started spending their free time together away from the band (and given that the band left her alone in her room can you blame her for this?), traveling separately to and from gigs (Ollila conveniently ignores to point out that it was to avoid that second hand smoke in the tour bus and no doubt to avoid putting up with the Nightwish ‘children’ when traveling in general) as well as in her other needs on tour. If she was demanding champagne and caviar each concert, then he’d have a point. No, Tarja only ‘demanded’ that she had water to drink and a simple diet that accounted for her digestive problems. And a separate dressing room would be nice, too.

Despite finally having her simple needs taken care of Tarja’s health would still suffer on future tours. Tuomas’ growing resentment, a kind of petulance associated with that of an immature child, that Tarja was no longer on her shelf to be pulled down at his convenience, poisoned the atmosphere.

Up next? The charge of unethical business behaviour on the part of Marcelo.

Critique of Once Upon a Nightwish, Part 11

This might take a bit so go grab a tea, coffee or something a little stronger….Back? Good. Let’s get started.

Unethical business practices, according to Ollila, drove the band to conclude in February of 2005 that to get rid of Marcelo they had to get rid of Tarja. Ollila concludes his portrait of the villain with the following general statement and applied it to a particular individual, Marcelo:

“Cavalier business tactics are not completely unusual among South American record labels. The continent is one of the strongholds of piracy, and suspicious releases are unfortunately quite common….South American corporate culture also differs from its European counterpart in many ways. According to Brazilian researchers, decades of economic recession and government corruption in Brazil and Argentina have implanted a deep distrust toward the system. When legislation has repeatedly been used only for the benefit of those in power, its obvious people do not have the same kind of respect for laws as in Europe. The Argentinean concept of viveza criolla—‘Creole resourcefulness’ or simply ‘native cunning’—points to an attitude characterized by avoidance of exertion, disregard for law, an affinity for individualism, distrust of others, reluctance toward teamwork, and acting in one’s own interest at the cost of everything else. So says a working paper by Spanish business professor Domenec Melé titled Corporate Ethical Policies in Large Corporations in Argentina, Brazil, and Spain.” (pg. 126)

Who is the author Domenec Melé? Click the link below for a brief biography:

http://www.iese.edu/en/faculty-research/professors/faculty-directory/domenec-mele/

Click the link below for the full article that Ollila references: The section on Argentina is worth quoting but I invite you to read it from the article in order to save space.

http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/enanpad2004-gsa-trabalhoconvidado.pdf

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that Marcelo has both a Spanish and Argentinian passport. That’s right. He’s a citizen of both countries. That kind of upsets Ollila’s point doesn’t it?

‘Cavalier business tactics are not unusual’ anywhere in the world, including Europe. After Spinefarm was bought by Universal, Century Child was to be distributed by Universal in France instead of their previous distributor XIII Bis Records. XIII Bis Records had an existing contract with Spinefarm and despite being told that they were not contractually allowed to release that album, they pressed copies from a promo copy of Century Child picked up in Finland by one of ‘the guys’ from XII Bis Records and released it prematurely. How stupid can you be by letting out promo discs to those who aren’t contracted to have them? Threats of law suits etc. got XIII Bis Records to pay double the usual fees for their transgression and after Universal ‘lost interest’ in releasing the album in France Spineform got XIII Bis Records to release it for them anyway. Spinefarm figured since previous Nightwish album sales were low in France anyway some distribution was better than none!!!!! No wonder Spinefarm claims that they have recouped only half of the advance and absolutely no royalties from XIII Bis Records for Century Child. With incompetents like that managing your business….who needs enemies? (pgs. 167-168)

Without having access to a person’s business records etc. it is impossible to gauge the ethical behaviour of an individual or company. What I hope to do here is shine a light upon the context within which Marcelo grew up in and was fundamentally shaped in ways that affected all Argentinians. In general, there is a symbiotic relationship between individuals and their society: individuals are shaped by the culture within which they grow up while at the same time they are not mere prisoners of that culture such that individuals can have a role in shaping their society, too.

The crux of the problem, identified by Dr. Melé and parroted by Ollila, is viveza criolla in a practical sense. In addition to the negative meanings given to the word above viveza criolla has been called “the principal cause of a moral, cultural, economic, social and political crisis”. I have little doubt of the veracity of the indictment today. But was this always the case? Where did this mode of behaviour come from? To learn this we must account for the appearance of the concept in its historical context. That means we’ll be delving into a little Argentine history.

Argentina has its roots in the Spanish colonization of the region during the 16th century. Argentina arose as the successor state of the Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata, a Spanish overseas colony founded in 1776. The declaration and fight for independence (1810–1818) was followed by an extended civil war that lasted until 1861. The country thereafter enjoyed relative peace and stability, with massive waves of European immigration radically reshaping its cultural and demographic outlook. In fact, about 90% of all immigrants came from Italy and Spain combined in the formative years of Argentina from 1870-1910 (Spain 980,686 [31%] and Italy 1,889192 [59%]). The main reason at the beginning was wage gaps compared to their native countries. In other words, Argentina was a land of opportunity to work for higher wages. The result was the almost-unparalleled increase in prosperity that led Argentina to become the seventh wealthiest developed nation in the world by the early 20th century. Because of this, by 1900-1910, immigrants showed the usual tendency to follow earlier migrants to take advantage of the prosperity that they found and to have an easier time integrating by joining established communities. Here’s a link to the article, written from credible sources, I cited the above from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Argentina

Given that Argentina was originally Spanish and given that Dr. Melé in his report (and Ollila) considers the European Spanish to be more ethical than their South American counterparts, the concept of viveza criolla by extension would not have been part of the nation’s and, more importantly, the colony’s initial ethos.

Therefore, I contend that the principal cause of viveza criolla was A RESPONSE TO a moral, cultural, economic, social and/or political crisis at some point in the country’s history.

What crisis could have been so profound to create such a change? The Stock Market Crash of October 1929 and the Great Depression that followed is the crisis that precipitated Argentina’s moral, cultural, economic, social and political decline up to the present day. Make no mistake: Argentina is still a vast country in resources and wealth. But since the 1930s, the social distribution of that wealth has been severely limited through corruption, cronyism, and corporate nationalism. In order to get a share of that wealth the practice of viveza criolla was the means to that end. In other words, for most, viveza criolla was the means to survival.

Argentine political history is a sordid affair since The Crash of 1929. From 1930 to 1946 Argentina has witnessed military coups, fraudulent elections and other general chaos. In 1946 saw the election of Juan Domingo Perón to lead the country. Perónism became a dominant political force in Argentina for the next 30 years despite its founder leaving for a 16 year exile after his overthrow in 1955 by the Liberating Revolution, a military and civilian uprising. A tug of war between political factions for power ensued. Perónism routinely resorted to organized violence and dictatorial rule. Perón showed contempt for any opponents, and regularly characterized them as traitors and agents of foreign powers. Perón maintained the institutions of democratic rule, but subverted freedoms through such actions as nationalizing the broadcasting system, centralizing the unions under his control, and monopolizing the supply of newspaper print. At times, Perón also resorted to tactics such as illegally imprisoning opposition politicians and journalists. It would be difficult to separate Perónism from corporate nationalism, for Perón nationalized Argentina’s large corporations, blurring distinctions between corporations and government. When Perónists were ousted from power during this time their enemies resorted to similar repressive tactics, even going so far as to outlaw the party. Another military coup occurred in the mid-70s and they enacted further revenge upon the followers of Perónism for their deeds of the past. Depending on the source, from 9,000 to 30,000 people simply vanished. The Junta was only overthrown when they lost the Falklands War with the UK in 1983.

Argentina has scuffled along from one crisis to the other up to the present, including the economic crisis of 2001-2002. In 2001, Argentina was in the midst of a crisis: heavily indebted, with an economy in complete stagnation (an almost three-year-long recession), and the exchange rate was fixed at one U.S. dollar per Argentine peso by law, which made exports uncompetitive and effectively deprived the state of having an independent monetary policy. Many Argentinians, but most especially companies, fearing an economic crash and possibly devaluation, were transforming pesos to dollars and withdrawing them from the banks in large amounts, usually transferring them to foreign accounts (capital flight). This run on the banks would collapse the economy completely unless the government froze banks accounts (ie. account holders could not withdraw their money). That only created more unrest.

No wonder Dr. Melé was so critical of Argentine business ethics. The large corporations took their cue from a corrupt government perpetually in chaos and its tyrannical bureaucracy. Government should strive to provide a favourable landscape for business to thrive; not to become a mill stone around its neck. Dr. Melé analysis barely scratches the surface on the corrupt corporate/government/bureaucratic connection, neglects the historical processes in play throughout the 20th Century, fails to account for the arise of viveza criolla in the first place and fails to account for the demographic influence of non-Iberian immigrants. This renders Dr. Melé’s comparative analysis incomplete and oversimplified at best and virtually meaningless at worst. Blaming the Italian immigrants at the beginning for the rise of viveza criolla is also too simplistic. Ultimately, Argentina’s demographic and historical development apart from any Spanish influence (beyond retaining the language) rendered the ethical comparison to one of apples compared to oranges.

There are more examples of such crises but the important point to note is this is the society in almost constant flux and turmoil that Marcelo, his parents and his grandparents grew up in. A society that in 1900 equaled the USA in GDP per person ($4,000, in 1990 dollars) and has now has only risen to $11,000 in 2010 compared to $31,000 in the USA. This is a society that gave the practice of viveza criolla a viable means of survival. Argentines had to play by different rules to navigate the minefield that made up their society; a minefield laid by the corporate/government/bureaucratic overlords. Argentina is a rich nation and if you have the political connections you have access to this wealth. Without connections, you did what you had to do to survive in these shark infested waters. As such, you either ate or were eaten. This is a set up that favours the individual despite the rhetoric focusing on the collective ideal.

I’m sure for some it is a disappointing that I didn’t come up with anything definitive beyond providing context. I don’t have access to the proper records to do that. Ollila cited a study that I’ve shown to be incomplete and flawed. The bottom line is that you must understand the market within which you plan to do business. That is a given for any business. What I tried to show was that the historical development of Argentina gave rise to the practice of viveza criolla which in turn was reinforced and perpetuated in the face of the corruption that lies at the heart of the corporate/government/bureaucratic triumvirate. On the outside this solution taken out of context appears unethical. By the standards of Argentine society these are the accepted rules. Any outside business interest, like Nightwish, either needs to understand them and adapt or don’t do business there. It’s that simple.

None of this should have been unknown to the managers of bands in Europe in general. In fact, it should have been common knowledge by the late 90’s that the rules in South America were different. When Nightwish saw Brazilians at their first show there wearing Nightwish t-shirts (when no licensing agreement existed that made them legal at the time) it should have been a wake up call. More managing and less partying would have been helpful. Nightwish and their handlers did not do their due diligence and learn what it was they were getting into. They only have themselves to blame that their mismanagement resulted in one of their members retaining a manager of her own who could only play by the only rule book he ever knew and who just happened to eventually become her husband.

Critique of Once Upon a Nightwish, Part 12

The Final Cut

Every time I posted a new Part of this long critique of Once Upon A Nightwish I always had the next topic in mind. All I needed to do was organized my thoughts, do some research as I needed to do in regard to Part 11, and write it down in a coherent manner. Sometimes that process took longer than I intended but I had to do it right. For quite some time, before Parts 10 and 11 were posted in truth, I haven’t been able to see any further avenues to expound upon. If something else does come to mind, I’ll be sure to add it. In June of 2016 I scribbled out what follows and sat on it for a bit just in case I had one more moment of inspiration. Alas, my ideas are still tapped out. So now I reckon it is time to wrap up the topic with some final thoughts and conclusions.

Was Tuomas H within his rights as founder of Nightwish to fire Tarja? As just a member of two metal bands TH had no outlet for the songs and music that he himself wrote and composed. He started his solo project that turned into Nightwish to be such an outlet and started recruiting friends and acquaintances that included Tarja to help him achieve his dreams of writing and recording his own music. As we know she changed the focus from quiet mood music to the creation of a new sub-genre of metal. But it was still his band and so, and this may surprise some, he had every right to make lineup changes that includes firing Tarja. Now don’t mistake his ‘right’ to fire her with the real or imagined provocations that lead to that decision, the method by which it was done nor with whether it was the ‘right’ (ie. correct) decision.

What I’ve tried to show in my critique, and I believe I have done so successfully, is that I have taken issue with the process TH went through when he exercised his ‘right’ to fire her. Firing by letter and through the band’s official website was cowardly and unprofessional. Later, Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish was a clumsy attempt to inflate Tarja and Marcelo’s role and minimized or ignored the bigger problem that was centered with TH and the poor performance of the band’s management team. Once Upon A Nightwish is, in the final analysis, nothing less than propaganda. To a discerning reader it is an extremely clumsy, if not, laughable attempt.

Did Tuomas H make the right or correct decision? I’ve found the two subsequent eras, defined by their lead singers, to be disappointing. Anette’s era represented Nightwish following the trend that started taking over the sub-genre at the time, as opposed to setting it for others to catch up during Tarja’s era, for a more commercialized sound in terms of vocals. Floor promised the potential of a return to the original roots but I found her (and other members, too) to be underutilized on the last album. I thought she and others had not contributed all they could have. Only TH fulfilled his potential but the keyboard centric album came at the expense of the others. So the answer is ‘No’.

However, Tarja apparently had decided that she wanted to do what TH had done ten years earlier: branch off into a solo career following the next album after ‘Once’ and its subsequent tour. TH was faced with having to find a new singer in any case but he would have had more time to do so. Tarja’s decision to strike off on her own, although prematurely it turned out, has, in time, proven to be a great success. Her blend of rock, metal and classical plus her pure classical projects has her in ascendance in terms of her ability and scope. Successful albums both as performer, writer (mostly in collaboration), producer; successful tours; prominent festival times (including headlining the MFVF); being sought out by other artists for collaborations (Within Temptation, Mike Oldfield, Scorpions, Doro, Schiller, Schandmaul plus with Raimo Sirkia and José Cura at the Savonlinna Opera Festival etc.); recruiting a loyal and talented core of musicians who love performing with her; garnering a loyal legion of fans worldwide and being granted complete creative freedom by her label is solid proof of her consistent and continual rise.

In conclusion, TH was within his ‘rights’ to make lineup changes; Once Upon a Nightwish as a piece of propaganda justifying that ‘right’ cannot be taken seriously; Nightwish has since been a disappointment to me despite having a strong committed legion of fans worldwide that continue to give them success; and Tarja was right in her instinct to desire a solo career to give outlet to her creative energies and at the moment she has yet to reach her full potential. Tarja Turunen has been at the center of musical innovation for 20 years and I don’t see that stopping any time soon.

It is now over ten years since the split and my critique and time have exposed the lies, misinformation and propaganda that make up Mape Ollila’s Once Upon A Nightwish. Can we now get over it already? Alas, probably not for many.

I thank you, dear reader, for making this topic the most viewed on Ethereal Metal Webzine; at least for now.

Interview With Kevin Chown: 2019

image

Interviewed by Jessica Clingempeel & Joshua Becker
1/29/2019

Hello Kevin, thanks for doing this interview with us. In September 2018, Tarja finally made it back to the states. I was cheering you guys on in NYC. How did the shows go in the States?

“It was great to finally do some shows in the USA after 8 full years seeing the rest of the world with all my crazy friends. The shows went well. It was interesting seeing the contrast between the international audiences and the one here in the USA. It was a totally different perspective on things. It was a pleasure to play all of the shows, NYC especially. That was the best show of the USA tour.”

Do you think her next album will bring more shows to the States?

“Tarja has a 2-3 year cycle of things, and we are about to start that cycle fresh this year….. Europe festivals, I’m sure Europe tour, South America, etc. I’ve been in over 60 countries with her so I imagine its only a matter of time within the cycle that we are back. I’m sure it wont be 9 years this time!! In all honesty, touring in the USA is not easy for ANY international band. But any international band always finds a way to get to places where their fans live. Some places are easier than others. The USA, as a country, does not make that easy for the fans of overseas artists to tour. The United States, and this moment in time, for international musicians, is probably THE MOST difficult country to tour in, in the world. As hard as China. Harder than Russia. Its not a concern for ME, but I am the only American in the band, so it does effect me!!”

What is the worst thing that has ever happened on tour?

“I’ve never been asked that….. so many things come to mind. Some personal, some musical. Some just LIFE. Personally? It’s my feeling that the worst thing that can ever happen on tour is if nobody shows up to see you. Tarja does NOT have this issue. She certainly has a loyal and steady fan base. Everywhere! But, not every artist, of whom I have played with, have that core to work from. Her fans should be proud of the collective THEY have created!! And continue to build it.

Regardless of whom you are a fan of, just remember that to us, the musicians, we tour for YOU. And we want you all to see us do what we love to do. We admire so many of you who come to shows around the world. But I will be honest, and this can be said for no matter WHO I play with or for: we need the lovers of music to unite when we happen to be in town, under the roof we provide, to create those special moments. They are, for YOU. Especially with Tarja and her great band. It’s the best band I have ever played in. We’re all damn proud of it. The worst thing that could EVER happen on tour, is that people don’t get to see just how far we have taken it, in the live show. All musicians want to create an experience that cant be forgotten. I don’t think the band has ever been better. Come to the shows!!! I’m not afraid to say, it’s BETTER than Nightwish. Let us PROVE it to you, if you are a denier or a skeptic.”

Regarding Tarja’s new album, will you be taking part in any, if not all, bass recordings?

“Of course, always. She has an amazing team of people that are constantly moving things in new and interesting musical directions.”

Any other details about the new album you can give us, or shall more be released to us “soon”?

“I am honest when I tell you, I only put things on my calendar when there is a plane ticket in my hand to begin the journey again. Stay tuned!!! You likely know as much as me!! HA!!”

Moving on, back in 2013 you had brain surgery due to epilepsy. How has it been since then?

“It has its ups and downs, but I am still Alive. What can I say? When you go thru something like that, each day has meaning. That comes with a price….. as the meaning is not always good!! BUT, somedays, the miracle of the fact that I am touring AT ALL comes into plain sight….. and I realize that I am a lucky to be doing it. There are close call, believe me. It doesn’t slow me down. If you have medical challenges, “nothing is going to stop me” is the only choice. My normal is fucked up. But, we all can say that in ways. I’m not special. So, I pick up my complications, try my hardest, and that’s just the way it’s going to be. If you want to do this AT ALL, regardless of if you have a health consideration, that’s the only mindset that will allow you to survive as an artist. Artists are the toughest of us all, sometimes. Don’t forget: most musicians put up with rejection, apathy, judgement…. and refuse to let it EVER stop us. Throw a health concern into this equation. An occasional seizure is still far easier than making a living in the music business. HA!!!”

Kudos to you for not allowing epilepsy to keep you from doing what you love. Has it ever hindered your ability to play though or keep you from giving your all?

“Thank you for that. I’ve played gigs after having seizures. I internalize the music, so its strange. Even in the delirium of waking up from a seizure, I can walk on stage and playa show, to nearly the highest level. (google Thessaloniki 2017 as an example). In ways, not thinking about it makes it easy. I don’t usually remember the show. It’s kind of bizarre….. Yes, I have missed a few shows. But, I can usually pull 90 minutes out of me, no matter how shitty I feel. A stage always seems to help me feel better.”

Moving on to the Swedish show you have recently been part of. How did you get involved in Allt För Sverige?

“I was asked a few years ago by a casting agent in LA if I would be interested…. But it never worked out with my touring schedule. 2018 was the first year I was available. When you live in LA, there are always small, strange connections to things. I ended up in Sweden, in other words, because hearing about that kind of stuff is normal, as someone who lives in LA and knows people in the broader entertainment business. It’s connected world wide, and it’s all rooted in Los Angeles, CA. But it was driven when I realized I had a chance to, in ways, reconnect my Swedish Heritage, reconnecting a lost link. In that strange quest, I have succeeded!!”

According to the description on the show, it is a reality show to meet long lost Swedish relatives. What was the process like about finding out about your heritage?

“It was revealing. I didn’t expect to find that my great great grandfather was sold into slavery by his own mother. But escaped, left Sweden and moved to America, creating a critical piece in the amazing family I am a part of. It hurt in ways. But then, it makes sense. Al Moberg, my great great grandfather, had challenges, just like me. And didn’t give up. Now I know why I am such a tough, stubborn old bastard that refuses to quit. Al Moberg and many like him, created the American spirit of fearlessness. I’m proud to uphold that legacy”.

When you get home from a long gig, or a lot of touring, what is the very first thing you do?

“I remember after a 32 hour flight home from Tokyo, in the wrong direction, Tokyo-Rome-Paris-Atlanta-Detroit-Escanaba, instead of the direct over the pacific flight, I kissed the ground. After this last tour, I totally unplugged all my devices and stared at the trees for a few days. It continued almost 2 months. 2018 was a bitch. It’s beyond exhausting. Tours never end happy. Because the tour is ending. Even though, you are exhausted. It’s complicated. You’re happy to be home but sad because you aren’t on the road. Every musician knows EXACTLY what I am talking about.”

You have been very vocal about the political state of our country lately, and with the Presidency. If you were a mouthpiece for the government, what would you say to them, and what policies would you change to make things better for us all?

“The mouthpiece TO them? Or FOR them? TO them (meaning any leader of any country, since we are talking politics), I would say the simple shit. If you care about your country more than you care about yourself, you are free to stay. If not, please consider another profession. Greed is the universal thing that divides people. Nothing can be successful if its run by people who openly dislike the idea of it even existing in the first place. How can you be a political leader if you say “government IS the problem”? YOU are government. You can’t build the house and tear it down at the same time. I honestly think the changes are nothing more than decisions we need to accept, as we all are forced to do in our own lives. There’s no right or wrong, there’s only compromise and results. It’s the easy way out to be famous for being against things. The path of a leader is to be FOR things. At that goes down to each and every one of us. What are YOU….. FOR!!!!?? Not AGAINST!!!? Would our leaders PLEASE rise to the occasion? And start to work FOR us, once again, as is possible? It’s our choice at the ballot box, then their choice, once in office. Only to be held accountable….. by THE PEOPLE. We all must join, then remain, in the conversation. To not care is to simply let the idiots win. Personally, I would never want to be the mouthpiece FOR the government. I DO know how to talk a lot however!! HA!! For future thought!!!!”

Do you find being successful in music makes certain things difficult, for example, going to a grocery store without being recognized?  In other words, does your profession keep you from living a normal life?

“Not at ALL. People in Escanaba are people I have known my entire life. I’m not Kevin there. I am “Jack Chown’s kid”. As it has always been and always will be. Its why I love it there. It has NEVER changed. Not one iota. People there will see me and talk about the weather. In LA? I’m the least famous person in THIS town, believe me. That stuff happens on tour, but its supposed to. That’s part of touring….. running into fans. I enjoy it.”

Having been in the music industry for so long, what is one key thing you would change about it, to make better for you, and other professional artists in the industry?

“WHEW. Where to begin? When I fell in love with music, at the time, music was what defined everyone. Were you a metalhead? A new-waver? A punk rocker? A fan of pop music? Country? Or, did you just love some of EACH of them? That was me. I love all music. But, I say this because there was a time when MUSIC, not social media, not gaming, not even movies or TV at the time….. shaped culture and how each of us fit into that culture, based in music. It drove our hairstyles. Our fashion choices. Our attitudes. It created our groups of friends. Its was led to us forming our first bands. That culture has been lost, and as a result, people are defined by a much broader menu of cultural options….. and music has lost its greater audience. People still and will always love music. BUT, its not like it used to be.There is no doubt the business has gotten smaller since I started. Its up to the fans of music to look back to the history of its role in our lives. If music matters to YOU? Then, spread the gospel. I hope one day, for music to return to being the themes to what matters to us. That’s when good music HAPPENS. When culture and music are in tune with each other. What the music business needs, just like any other, is customers. WE call them FANS. No mater what, if musicians cant make a living, there will be fewer people making music. I have watched it happen in my lifetime. Are the fans of music, who are the TRUE music business, aware of this? Musicians, with the exception of very few, are all normal people. We have bills, a life, health problems….. just like everyone. The more we have OF your, the more we can then give back TO YOU. Because we can make a decent living. Believe me, being a musician is NEVER easy. The music business, and everyone who is a part of it, needs nothing more than YOU.”

It’s been a little while since we heard anything from Der Elefant, and the Facebook page is not updated much anymore. Are there any future
collaborations in the works?

“Me and Alex have thrown a few concepts around about what we want to do next. I’m sure we will be doing something when the universe makes it so. That goes for nearly anything I do. Nothing in life is certain, let alone in the music business. It happens when it happens. Then you make it the best you can make it.”

image

Photo ©

Christian Kretschmar

What about a future with Chad Smith’s Bombastic Meatbats?

“I just returned to LA for the first time since May. Jeff has been gone. Ed is all over the place with his solo career as well as Robbie Krieger, Chad of course, is all over the place. This is the first time we all have been in LA at the same time in a few years. There’s talk, we even have about half a record written. Its just a matter of time. We just never seem to have enough time to do it!!”

What else would you like to say to our readers and to all your fans out there?

“I would say, it’s an honor to play music for you all. Keep the love moving forward. We live in a crazy world. We’re all surrounded by bullshit on a daily basis. It’s an honor to help create a world of openness, optimism and honesty, all rooted upon the waves of music. The bullshit is always at the doorstep, but at a show, at least for those 90 minutes, it’s a pleasure to be part of creating a moment that matters from time to time, for anyone who’s looking to come in search of a moment, away from the madness. We’re all in this together.”

image

Photo © Jessica Clingempeel

Interview with Lauri of Stratovarius (A Nordic Symphony/Enigma: Intermission II)

image

Interview by Joshua Becker & Jessica Clingempeel
10/2/2018

A Nordic Symphony tour has officially started, how has it been so far?

Today is the second show, so it´s early to tell yet. But Stratovarius camp is feeling good and it´s nice to play some new and other songs we haven´t played in a long time. It´s also great to also introduce our music to Tarja´s audiences.

It is unfortunate that this tour saw no U.S. dates, do you find with many European bands, it is difficult with scheduling, promotions, etc., to get proper recognition in the United States?

Unfortunately we haven’t toured U.S. in a long time, the best chance for U.S. audiences to see us have been on 70000 cruises. The biggest problem in touring the US is in the cost of visas and big distances between cities so logistically we have been not able to get it working well enough to tour there for many years. I hope we can get back to touring the U.S at some point when the right tour comes along.

What was the process for how A Nordic Symphony came to be? Was Tarja one to initiate this meeting, or how exactly did this process happen?

Tarja´s management approached us with the idea of a co-headlining tour. We knew Intermission II was coming out in October and we wont have a new album until 2019 so it felt like a thing to do. I think it´s great to tour with other bands as you get to play also for other audiences than just Stratovarius fans. Hopefully we will gain some new friends and fans on this tour.

Were there any other bands in mind to work with on this tour, or was this a set collaboration with only Tarja?

Just Tarja this time, but you never know from the future. I think with next album we will do some headlining shows first before another collaboration tour.

Have you done any work with Tarja prior to this tour?

Tarja has visited our show once or twice to sing Forever but we have not worked together before. As Finns everybody knows everyone else from many years back already.

Are any of the shows being recorded for a live DVD release?

No such plans on this tour

Is there a chance for a future album collaboration with Tarja, or any other big names in metal?

No plans for that either, but maybe we do something with a symphony orchestra at some point.

Your album, Enigma: Intermission II, just released on the 28th of September. How has it been received so far by your listeners?

It came out just 2 days ago so it´s early to tell, but the single Oblivion has done well in streams. We have a good following so i hope they will be into it.

Can you walk us through the process of choosing material for this album? Were there songs you were set on, and then changed your mind on later?

This albums material comes from 3 sources. First there is 3 new songs we did which were picked from a bunch of material we have but are not going on the next Stratovarius album. Second there is the orchestral tracks which were chosen from last 4 albums. We wanted 1 track from each album so looked at which songs the fans liked the most and would work best with orchestral arrangements. Thirdly the rest of the songs are bonus tracks from last 4 albums, there is a bunch of tracks there which have been only released on special vinyls and for instance in Japan, we wanted to share these songs now with all our fans.

For fans new and old, what is one thing you hope the fans gain by listening to this new album? Any message(s) you want to convey to them?

Stratovarius is going strong, I hope you can come and see us live!

As a fan of astrology, I really like the idea of using the zodiac as part of the background for the cover art. What made the band want to run in this direction with the album cover? Kudos to Gyula Havancsák.

Astronomical themes have always been with Stratovarius it is a part of Stratovarius mythology ever since Visions, we like to follow these themes in most of our artwork. Guyla has been a big part of our visual image ever since he got onboard in 2009.

Being that this band does not have its original founding members anymore, do you ever worry about disrupting or tarnishing the legacy from the bandmates before you?

Not really the old lineups are alive on the albums and documents of those eras, this is what Stratovarius is in 2018, if someone is just interested in a certain era of the band, he/she can choose to listen just to those albums.

Regarding the line-up changes, the band still keeps going, and stays true to its musical roots. What about this band gives it such a legacy for others to keep alive?

The old times are gone and they will never return, Stratovarius is a big part life for everyone in the band and we do the best we can to continue the legacy that is Stratovarius. As long as we feel the fire, we keep doing this and we do feel the fire still.